Publications
Date:
16.06.2025
Важно! Речь идет о продаже нелицензированных электрошокеров! Это то, о чем мы неоднократно предупреждаем будущих покупателей!
Китайские «миллионы вольт» к продаже запрещены, как бы не утверждали обратное продавцы контрафакта.
Китайские «миллионы вольт» к продаже запрещены, как бы не утверждали обратное продавцы контрафакта.
По требованию прокуратуры магазин прекратил продажу нелицензированного товара.
Date:
16.06.2025
«Я убежден, что использование электрошокеров нашей полицией абсолютно необходимо»,— сказал глава МВД газете Berliner Morgenpost. По его оценкам, это подходящее средство для борьбы с возросшей угрозой в отношении полицейских в общественных местах.
Электрошокеры эффективнее дубинок, но менее травматичны, чем огнестрельное оружие, пояснил Александр Добриндт. Правоохранители планируют применять их в отношении правонарушителей с колюще-режущими предметами.
Date:
09.07.2020
On July 9, 2020, Ekaterina Stolyarevskaya, CEO of the March Group company, took part in the Polygon program on Moscow Speaks radio.
Electroshock weapons have appeared relatively recently. Therefore, the general public does not know much about shockers. And what is known is not always plausible.
Ekaterina Stolyarevskaya, General Director of the Mart Group company, answers questions from the presenter and radio listeners about tasers. Up—to-date information about tasers - first-hand!
Date:
06.07.2020
Currently, electroshock devices (hereinafter referred to as ESCs) manufactured on the territory of the Russian Federation are divided into two large classes:
civilian self–defense weapons for individuals or "civilian" ESCs [1],
special means for law enforcement officers or "official" ESCs [2].
The terms "civilian" and "service" ESH are not entirely correct (ESH do not refer to service weapons), but for convenience of description we will use these terms.
The output parameters of the "civilian" ESU are regulated by GOST 50940-96 [3], and special equipment – OST 78.01.0009-2002 [4].
In accordance with [3], the average power of exposure to ESH for citizens should not exceed 3 watts.
Similar parameters for "service" ESCs are three times higher (30 J for the maximum exposure time and, accordingly, 10 watts).
Many people suspect that civilian 3-watt ESCs have such a weak effect on offenders that their use is simply unsafe for users (the attacker will not be stunned, but will get angry and attack the user with a vengeance).
In addition, there is a rumor that American "tasers" (or "tasers", who transcribes how) much more powerful than our ESUS, for example, allegedly CEW (Conducted Energy Weapon – ESU) models Taser M26, Taser X26E, Taser X26P have an impact power of 26 watts, which is reflected in their names, i.e. much higher than the ESU produced in the Russian Federation.
We propose to deal with these issues on the merits.
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26.
In the USA, the output power (output energy) given to the load of the ASH (target) is not regulated at all! The output parameters of the ESU are estimated by determining the average exposure current at a load resistance of 600 ohms or (equivalently) the electric charge given to this load (the electric charge is calculated as the integral of the exposure current over the exposure time). Therefore, references to an output power of 26 watts are untenable, since it is never measured (or even calculated) by either the manufacturer or the scientific laboratories conducting the ESU tests.
Indeed, in the literature it is sometimes possible to find an indication of the power of 26 watts of the Taser M26 product, however, this refers to a certain "Internal Power Rating" associated with energy consumption from the ESU (battery) power source*, and not the power of the high-voltage current pulse given to the load (which we are talking about when we give the parameters of domestic ESCs). By the way, it is difficult in the literature, but you can also find an indication of the power in the load, which for the Taser M26 is 10 watts, and for the Taser X26 is 1.3 Watts (with "internal power" already 7 watts, not 26 watts) [5].
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26
At the same time, the Taser X26, according to the manufacturers themselves, is a much more effective device (in the sense of providing temporary damage to the target), since it uses a different form of current pulses. But this is a completely different story.…
Thus, these 26 watts are just the "beauty" of the translation into Russian or some kind of advertising trick, which will be proved below.
[6] provides data on measuring the output parameters of the Taser X26P ESH (the P index means "intended for use by the police", therefore its output parameters are higher than those of civilian ESH).
[7] shows the calculation data (not measurements!) the average power and energy of the Taser ASH exposure based on the data [6]. For the Taser X26P ASHU, the average output power is 1.25 watts, and the energy given off during the maximum exposure time (for this product - 5 seconds, not 3 seconds, allowed in the Russian Federation) is 6.25 J. If we assume that the exposure time is also 3 seconds, then this parameter will be even less, namely 3.75 J!
Thus, even Taser family police ESCs have significantly lower power output compared to Russian civilian ESCs.
It should be noted that even with this power, the probability of temporary injury (immobilization) of an offender or attacker in these ESCs at distances of 1 ...5 m is very high, even higher than in firearms (long-term statistics on the use of ESCs by police officers in the United States confirm this, see, for example, [8]).
Why, nevertheless, a reliable temporary defeat of the target occurs with such a small energy is another question, for example, there is a consideration that such an effect is provided not only by the shape and amplitude of current pulses, but also by the geometric volume of their propagation (the so–called "set of current paths" in the target body [9]). Perhaps that is why all American remote ESCs** (contact ESCs are not currently manufactured in the USA) are designed so that the discrepancy between the probes on the target is at least 30...40 cm.
In Russian ESH and DESH, the distance between the output (combat) electrodes or between the probes is strictly regulated in [3,4]: no more than 40 mm between the electrodes and 300 mm between the probes. Perhaps that is why their output power should be higher than that of American ESCs (to obtain the desired damaging effect).
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26
So, the output power and energy of Russian–made civilian ESCs significantly exceed similar parameters of US-made ESCs, and the American supposedly 26 watts is nothing more than a fake.
For an example of similar fakes, let's recall that Chinese ASHU advertise like this: "Stun guns with an output voltage of 500,000 volts, 1 million volts..." etc. Cool, right? But it absolutely does not correspond to reality, since they do not even have 100 KV (usually 50 ... 60 KV), and the output current (in fact, it is the high–voltage pulse current that affects the target) is scanty and it does not have a real effect on the target.
If you like, you can come up with a similar advertising trick yourself, and do without obvious fakes. For example, in [7] the calculated value of the average electrical power of a single pulse of high-voltage current generated by the Russian-made AIR-M140R is given: 1250...1260 watts, and this is not a fake. Great, now you can specify in advertising and information materials: "The AIR-M140 product has a colossal, truly unsurpassed power - more than 1.25 kilowatts, which is 50 times higher than the characteristics of the Taser! Our shocker is cooler than an electric kettle!"
At the same time, we will keep silent that the average power should not be calculated for a single pulse, but for the entire set of pulses during exposure, i.e. taking into account their duration (typical value - 48 microseconds) and the repetition period (typical value - 6.4 milliseconds), while the pulse duty cycle (the ratio of the repetition period to the duration) is equal to 134, and taking into account the borehole, the actual average power during the exposure will be "only" about 9.5 watts, i.e. within the limits regulated by the regulatory documents of the Russian Federation for service ESCs.
You can even organize a competition for the best similar slogan, and even with a jingle with the sound of a thermonuclear explosion at the moment of the impact of the ASH on the target. It's worth thinking about it…
Comparison of Russian civil and service ESCs
Russian service ESCs outperform civilian ones by about 3 times in their characteristics. However, it does not follow from this that civilian ESCs are weak and have a bad effect on the target, and for the police it is necessary to reliably defeat the target. The point is completely different: civilian and service ESCs are used in radically different operational and tactical situations and solve different tasks.
The main task of the user of a civil ESH is to protect himself or his loved ones from the aggressive actions of the offender. There are two possible solutions to this problem:
to frighten the enemy and reduce his aggression by threatening to use ESH, for example, using a loud crackle that occurs between protective electrodes when the ESH is turned on (most often found in the practice of conflict resolution between civilians). In this case, the main property of the ESH is not the output power, but the volume, frequency and tone of the sound of the discharges;
apply ASH to an aggressive enemy, ensuring his temporary immobilization or escape, respectively, the possibility of his own subsequent retreat, while the villain recovers from the electric shock.
Since exposure to modern domestic civilian ESH has a noticeable aftereffect (the target continues to experience severe pain, dizziness and muscle weakness for some time after the end of exposure to ESH), retreat (in fact, flight from the conflict site) is quite possible and even appropriate for civilians who do not have special skills in detaining offenders.
It should be noted that with an output voltage of 50 kV and above, the villain's clothes are not an obstacle even in winter, and a power of 3 watts allows you to successfully hit the enemy (which is confirmed by repeated biomedical tests of the ASH), especially since, as mentioned earlier, it is more than 2 times higher, than their American counterparts (see the previous section), despite the fact that they have similar forms of high-voltage current pulses (but the pulse repetition rate is much higher).
The main task of the user of the service e–mail is to protect himself and/or third parties from the aggressive actions of the offender and detain him for subsequent legal actions.
This task differs significantly from the tasks of civilian ESCs, including in terms of operational and tactical situations that arise when solving it.
Such differences are not limited to the following.
Law enforcement officers have to deal not only with a threatening or attacking person, but also with a fleeing offender.
It is often not possible to apply the service ESH to one target during the maximum exposure time (sometimes it is necessary to quickly apply the ESH sequentially to several targets), therefore, to obtain the same effect with short-term exposure, it is necessary to have a product of higher power.
civilian self–defense weapons for individuals or "civilian" ESCs [1],
special means for law enforcement officers or "official" ESCs [2].
The terms "civilian" and "service" ESH are not entirely correct (ESH do not refer to service weapons), but for convenience of description we will use these terms.
The output parameters of the "civilian" ESU are regulated by GOST 50940-96 [3], and special equipment – OST 78.01.0009-2002 [4].
In accordance with [3], the average power of exposure to ESH for citizens should not exceed 3 watts.
Similar parameters for "service" ESCs are three times higher (30 J for the maximum exposure time and, accordingly, 10 watts).
Many people suspect that civilian 3-watt ESCs have such a weak effect on offenders that their use is simply unsafe for users (the attacker will not be stunned, but will get angry and attack the user with a vengeance).
In addition, there is a rumor that American "tasers" (or "tasers", who transcribes how) much more powerful than our ESUS, for example, allegedly CEW (Conducted Energy Weapon – ESU) models Taser M26, Taser X26E, Taser X26P have an impact power of 26 watts, which is reflected in their names, i.e. much higher than the ESU produced in the Russian Federation.
We propose to deal with these issues on the merits.
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26.
In the USA, the output power (output energy) given to the load of the ASH (target) is not regulated at all! The output parameters of the ESU are estimated by determining the average exposure current at a load resistance of 600 ohms or (equivalently) the electric charge given to this load (the electric charge is calculated as the integral of the exposure current over the exposure time). Therefore, references to an output power of 26 watts are untenable, since it is never measured (or even calculated) by either the manufacturer or the scientific laboratories conducting the ESU tests.
Indeed, in the literature it is sometimes possible to find an indication of the power of 26 watts of the Taser M26 product, however, this refers to a certain "Internal Power Rating" associated with energy consumption from the ESU (battery) power source*, and not the power of the high-voltage current pulse given to the load (which we are talking about when we give the parameters of domestic ESCs). By the way, it is difficult in the literature, but you can also find an indication of the power in the load, which for the Taser M26 is 10 watts, and for the Taser X26 is 1.3 Watts (with "internal power" already 7 watts, not 26 watts) [5].
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26
At the same time, the Taser X26, according to the manufacturers themselves, is a much more effective device (in the sense of providing temporary damage to the target), since it uses a different form of current pulses. But this is a completely different story.…
Thus, these 26 watts are just the "beauty" of the translation into Russian or some kind of advertising trick, which will be proved below.
[6] provides data on measuring the output parameters of the Taser X26P ESH (the P index means "intended for use by the police", therefore its output parameters are higher than those of civilian ESH).
[7] shows the calculation data (not measurements!) the average power and energy of the Taser ASH exposure based on the data [6]. For the Taser X26P ASHU, the average output power is 1.25 watts, and the energy given off during the maximum exposure time (for this product - 5 seconds, not 3 seconds, allowed in the Russian Federation) is 6.25 J. If we assume that the exposure time is also 3 seconds, then this parameter will be even less, namely 3.75 J!
Thus, even Taser family police ESCs have significantly lower power output compared to Russian civilian ESCs.
It should be noted that even with this power, the probability of temporary injury (immobilization) of an offender or attacker in these ESCs at distances of 1 ...5 m is very high, even higher than in firearms (long-term statistics on the use of ESCs by police officers in the United States confirm this, see, for example, [8]).
Why, nevertheless, a reliable temporary defeat of the target occurs with such a small energy is another question, for example, there is a consideration that such an effect is provided not only by the shape and amplitude of current pulses, but also by the geometric volume of their propagation (the so–called "set of current paths" in the target body [9]). Perhaps that is why all American remote ESCs** (contact ESCs are not currently manufactured in the USA) are designed so that the discrepancy between the probes on the target is at least 30...40 cm.
In Russian ESH and DESH, the distance between the output (combat) electrodes or between the probes is strictly regulated in [3,4]: no more than 40 mm between the electrodes and 300 mm between the probes. Perhaps that is why their output power should be higher than that of American ESCs (to obtain the desired damaging effect).
Comparison of domestic ESCs with Taser CEW family 26
So, the output power and energy of Russian–made civilian ESCs significantly exceed similar parameters of US-made ESCs, and the American supposedly 26 watts is nothing more than a fake.
For an example of similar fakes, let's recall that Chinese ASHU advertise like this: "Stun guns with an output voltage of 500,000 volts, 1 million volts..." etc. Cool, right? But it absolutely does not correspond to reality, since they do not even have 100 KV (usually 50 ... 60 KV), and the output current (in fact, it is the high–voltage pulse current that affects the target) is scanty and it does not have a real effect on the target.
If you like, you can come up with a similar advertising trick yourself, and do without obvious fakes. For example, in [7] the calculated value of the average electrical power of a single pulse of high-voltage current generated by the Russian-made AIR-M140R is given: 1250...1260 watts, and this is not a fake. Great, now you can specify in advertising and information materials: "The AIR-M140 product has a colossal, truly unsurpassed power - more than 1.25 kilowatts, which is 50 times higher than the characteristics of the Taser! Our shocker is cooler than an electric kettle!"
At the same time, we will keep silent that the average power should not be calculated for a single pulse, but for the entire set of pulses during exposure, i.e. taking into account their duration (typical value - 48 microseconds) and the repetition period (typical value - 6.4 milliseconds), while the pulse duty cycle (the ratio of the repetition period to the duration) is equal to 134, and taking into account the borehole, the actual average power during the exposure will be "only" about 9.5 watts, i.e. within the limits regulated by the regulatory documents of the Russian Federation for service ESCs.
You can even organize a competition for the best similar slogan, and even with a jingle with the sound of a thermonuclear explosion at the moment of the impact of the ASH on the target. It's worth thinking about it…
Comparison of Russian civil and service ESCs
Russian service ESCs outperform civilian ones by about 3 times in their characteristics. However, it does not follow from this that civilian ESCs are weak and have a bad effect on the target, and for the police it is necessary to reliably defeat the target. The point is completely different: civilian and service ESCs are used in radically different operational and tactical situations and solve different tasks.
The main task of the user of a civil ESH is to protect himself or his loved ones from the aggressive actions of the offender. There are two possible solutions to this problem:
to frighten the enemy and reduce his aggression by threatening to use ESH, for example, using a loud crackle that occurs between protective electrodes when the ESH is turned on (most often found in the practice of conflict resolution between civilians). In this case, the main property of the ESH is not the output power, but the volume, frequency and tone of the sound of the discharges;
apply ASH to an aggressive enemy, ensuring his temporary immobilization or escape, respectively, the possibility of his own subsequent retreat, while the villain recovers from the electric shock.
Since exposure to modern domestic civilian ESH has a noticeable aftereffect (the target continues to experience severe pain, dizziness and muscle weakness for some time after the end of exposure to ESH), retreat (in fact, flight from the conflict site) is quite possible and even appropriate for civilians who do not have special skills in detaining offenders.
It should be noted that with an output voltage of 50 kV and above, the villain's clothes are not an obstacle even in winter, and a power of 3 watts allows you to successfully hit the enemy (which is confirmed by repeated biomedical tests of the ASH), especially since, as mentioned earlier, it is more than 2 times higher, than their American counterparts (see the previous section), despite the fact that they have similar forms of high-voltage current pulses (but the pulse repetition rate is much higher).
The main task of the user of the service e–mail is to protect himself and/or third parties from the aggressive actions of the offender and detain him for subsequent legal actions.
This task differs significantly from the tasks of civilian ESCs, including in terms of operational and tactical situations that arise when solving it.
Such differences are not limited to the following.
Law enforcement officers have to deal not only with a threatening or attacking person, but also with a fleeing offender.
It is often not possible to apply the service ESH to one target during the maximum exposure time (sometimes it is necessary to quickly apply the ESH sequentially to several targets), therefore, to obtain the same effect with short-term exposure, it is necessary to have a product of higher power.
Date:
25.11.2019
The deputies of the State Duma adopted in the second reading a bill on the right of employees of transport security units to use tasers. Deputy Director of Rosgvardiya Sergey Zakharkin previously clarified that we are talking about tasers with a capacity of up to 9 J/sec.
According to the document, employees of such structures will be able to use devices to repel attacks on transport infrastructure facilities, vehicles and themselves, as well as to suppress resistance provided by the violator to employees during execution.
In addition, it is proposed to use a taser when detaining persons caught committing a crime or administrative offense if they are trying to escape, or there are "sufficient grounds to believe that they intend to provide armed resistance."
The police will be required to warn about the intention to use a stun gun. And only in exceptional cases, when there is a real danger to passengers, they can act without warning.
At the same time, the document clarifies that employees of transport security units should strive to ensure that the harm caused is minimal, and they are obliged to provide first aid to persons who have received bodily injuries, the Federal News Agency reports.
In addition, stun guns and spark arresters will not be used against women with visible signs of pregnancy, persons with obvious signs of disability and minors. An exception in this case will be cases where these persons commit an attack that threatens the life or health of employees of transport security units or passengers.
If adopted, the law will enter into force 90 days after the date of its official publication.
Last year, during the inspection of passengers, security officers seized 247 firearms, 56.5 thousand ammunition and 32 kilograms of explosives, Rossiyskaya Gazeta adds.
Date:
26.08.2018
Estonian police assistants are offered to be given tasers and allowed to use weapons. The Law Commission of the Parliament has come up with such an initiative. The deputies sent amendments to the relevant law for the first reading.
The current provisions of the law provide for the use of firearms only in case of emergency self-defense and not exceeding its limits. And there are no rules for using tasers at all.
"The purpose of the bill is to increase the efficiency of police assistants and eliminate legal obstacles that interfere with daily work," the press service of the Estonian parliament reported.
In general, the new law should significantly expand the rights of police assistants. At the same time, it is supposed to involve them in other types of activities. For example, they will be allowed to work in the criminal investigation department or detain violators of traffic rules.
An Estonian citizen over the age of 18 can become a police officer's assistant. Special training lessons and trainings are conducted for volunteers.
Law enforcement officers from other countries also began to use weapons more often. The French gendarmes are more willing to grab it than many of their colleagues.
Date:
11.07.2018
Special electroshock shields may soon be put into service by units of the Russian Guard and the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The outer surface of the shield has the ability to shock.
The last day of the exhibition of advanced law enforcement technologies is taking place in Balashikha, near Moscow. At one of the stands, a policeman demonstrates the capabilities of a new electric shock shield.
The shield still protects the policeman from stones, bottles and other objects, but in addition, its outer surface is capable of electric shock. During the operation of the shocker, the shield emits an eerie crackle of an electric discharge. In addition, the surface of the shield can be treated with a special non-flammable compound. The shield will not light up even if a bottle of gasoline hits it.
The novelty has already passed all tests and can be delivered to the Interior Ministry this year.
Date:
11.07.2018
The State Duma approved in the first reading the initiative of United Russia deputies allowing employees of transport security units to use electric shock devices. It is proposed to amend article 12 of the Federal Law "On Transport Security". In turn, such an amendment will officially include stun guns in the list of weapons used by employees accredited to protect transport infrastructure and vehicles from acts of unlawful interference. This list was approved by a government decree. That is, it will be necessary to make changes to the resolution. Tasers have already been adopted by customs officers, rangers, foresters and departmental guards of fifteen ministries and agencies of Russia - from nuclear energy to the State Reserve, except for transport security units.
By the way, of all the security structures, these are the most unarmed. Rather, those who guard train stations, stations, river and sea ports, airports. Russian Railways guards can only be armed with rubber sticks. Everything else, especially firearms, is prohibited. Since they serve in crowded places, shooting can cause accidental casualties. A bullet can ricochet, hit a multi-meter glass structure, bringing down a hail of fragments on people, blow up a gas tank or a fuel tank.
However, workers guarding bridges, depots, warehouses, berths, docks, sections of tracks and other infrastructure facilities are armed with firearms - rifles, carbines, pistols and revolvers, but there are no shockers.
Which is not entirely logical. As a private citizen, a Russian citizen has the right to purchase a shocker and use it for self-defense. And without any permission or license. I just went to a specialty store and bought the device I liked. But as soon as he took over the protection of the transport facility, that's all, it is forbidden to use it. Even for your own protection.
Stun guns are especially useful for subway guards. They face acute situations more often than their other colleagues. With such, for example, as a drunken brawl at the turnstiles, an attack on an inspection specialist. Sometimes a stoned youth company decides to take a ride on the subway for free. Or with such "spontaneous" phenomena as football fans or participants in rallies and demonstrations (regardless of the occasion and political preferences). Even the police and riot police are not always able to stop the crowd with rubber sticks, and it is impossible to use tear gas in the dungeon - you will get poisoned yourself, shooting, even from injuries, is dangerous and criminal, since innocent people will surely suffer according to the law of meanness.
The most realistic effective and safe option is to use electroshock devices. They will electrocute exactly the person they poke this device at. But it is possible to provide the guards not only with the usual short-range devices, when it is necessary to come close to the intruder, but also shooting ones. Such as GARD, for example. This is a remote-compact electroshock device with a replaceable clip for five shots. When you press the trigger of the device, a high-voltage discharge initiates two cartridges, from which "probes" fly out, unwinding the wire and creating a conductive line to the target. That is, two contacts are inserted into the attacker's clothes and he is very sensitively electrocuted, the discharge power is 10 watts. In the civilian version, the power will be up to 3 watts. Depending on the cartridge, you can shoot at a distance of 3 to 10 meters. The device weighs 600 grams, the power source is a lithium polymer battery. There is a laser designator - it is difficult to miss.
"It is forbidden to use shockers against children, the elderly, the disabled and pregnant women."
The most important thing is that electric shock is not fatal for a person, he will be convulsed, he may lose consciousness and be helpless for 5 to 15 minutes. Just enough time to tie or handcuff him, take him to the department or call for help. Abroad, in particular in the USA, tasers have been used by the police since the 70s. Of course, like any weapon and special equipment, shockers are prohibited from being used against children, the elderly, the disabled and pregnant women.
Help "RG"
The right to use the ESU has already been granted:
security guards of private security companies;
non-departmental security staff;
bailiffs;
employees of federal postal service organizations;
officials of specially authorized state bodies for the protection, supervision and regulation of the use of wildlife and their habitat;
police officers.
non-departmental security staff;
bailiffs;
employees of federal postal service organizations;
officials of specially authorized state bodies for the protection, supervision and regulation of the use of wildlife and their habitat;
police officers.
Date:
05.06.2018
Last year marked the 25th anniversary of the release of the first electroshock devices with the "MARCH" logo. The occasion is more than suitable to recall the main stages of the formation and development of the company.
1992 — the formation of the team of the company "MARCH"
The main thing is the idea! Several employees of the Radio Engineering Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences got into the hands of an electroshock police baton of European manufacture. Professional curiosity forced me to disassemble the device, and familiarity with the filling led to the idea that it could be done better.
1993 — the official registration of the company (March) and the release of the first tasers (December)
Said and done! And the first "Scorpion-350" with four electrodes was born, and soon — and "Malvina-250-A".
1994 — the law "On weapons" prohibited the possession and use of ASH by citizens
A promising idea to launch the production of civilian stun guns for self-defense came across a new law "On weapons". But the company's management did not give up: focusing on the development of ESH models for law enforcement agencies, they simultaneously engaged in promoting the idea of the need for civilian shockers at the highest level.
1997 — adoption of the new law "On Weapons"
The result of these efforts was the lifting of the ban on ASH in the new law "On weapons". Irina Anatolyevna Stolyarevskaya received a commendation from the State Duma for her work on the new law, and became an official expert on electroshock weapons of the State Duma Security Committee.
1998 — obtaining a license
The new law allowed citizens to use electroshock weapons only from Russian licensed manufacturers. The company "MART" became the first among such manufacturers.
2000 — the release of the first stun gun "Malvina-200-B" and the opening of its own certified testing laboratory
By the beginning of the new millennium, MART had developed a new battery-powered Malvina-200 model. And the creation of our own laboratory "Expertise of ESH" allowed us to raise the quality of products to a new level.
2001 — release of Taser cartridges for tasers
The "MARCH" shockers have learned how to shoot. So far, with Taser cartridges.
2002 — the first stun gun "AIR 107-U" (Spanish 350) with a removable battery
The first police taser…
2002 — the first state contract for stun guns of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
...and the first government contract!
2003 — the release of the first stun gun "Malvina-200-A" and the first inspection device "Periscope-165"
The catalog was supplemented with another model of the stun gun, and "Periscope-165" became the first swallow in a series of "non-shock" developments of "MARCH".
2004 — the release of the first stun gun "Karakurt"
The first "Karakurt" marked the beginning of a line of stun guns in the form of a pistol grip.
2006 — the release of the first firing stun gun, its own firing cartridge "BTER", and a shortened shocker "Scorpion-250"
"2006" is not just another mark in the chronology of the company, but a real milestone in its history. The first Russian shooting shocker and its cartridge were developed by specialists of "MART"! Soon, the company will completely switch to the production of contact-remote models of the ESU.
2010 — the release of the new inspection device "Periscope-185"
"Periscope-165" has grown, and has become "Periscope-185"!
2011 — the release of the light and sound cartridge "KSS" and shocker series "Scorpion" with removable batteries
Development of removable batteries: now the owners of Scorpions can not worry about a low battery. If there is no place to recharge the shocker, just put a new battery!
It is difficult to calculate how many times the KSS light and sound cartridge has been used since 2011. But we can say with confidence: those against whom "KSS" was used will never forget it!
2012 — the release of the first stun guns with a laser designator
Shooting with the BTER cartridge has become even more convenient!
2013 — release of a shortened shocker for the Ministry of Internal Affairs "AIR 107-U" (Spanish 250)
MART has always maintained feedback from users, listening to comments and suggestions. This is how the shortened AIR-107-U (sp.250) appeared.
2015 — the release of the Karakurt-Mini stun
gun The smallest and most unusual shocker in the company's catalog appeared in 2015. The original, unlike anything else, shape, cases of different colors, removable stickers made the "Minik" popular among fans of stylish devices.
2016 — release of the AIR stun gun "M-140"
A shocker in the shape of a pistol is for those who are sure that a weapon should look like a weapon. Special round-shaped firing cartridges have been developed for the M-140 air rifle.
2017 — the release of the Periscope-PRO video inspection device, a stun gun with a Cerberus metal detector, and the Skala electric shock shield
, the pre-jubilee year was rich in the development of special equipment for law enforcement agencies and customs services.
Today, MART GROUP is the official supplier of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and other structures and departments. The company regularly participates in exhibitions in Russia and abroad, MART GROUP products are sold in almost 20 countries. In Russia, civilian stun guns can be purchased in more than two hundred stores across the country, as well as ordered online.
1992 — the formation of the team of the company "MARCH"
The main thing is the idea! Several employees of the Radio Engineering Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences got into the hands of an electroshock police baton of European manufacture. Professional curiosity forced me to disassemble the device, and familiarity with the filling led to the idea that it could be done better.
1993 — the official registration of the company (March) and the release of the first tasers (December)
Said and done! And the first "Scorpion-350" with four electrodes was born, and soon — and "Malvina-250-A".
1994 — the law "On weapons" prohibited the possession and use of ASH by citizens
A promising idea to launch the production of civilian stun guns for self-defense came across a new law "On weapons". But the company's management did not give up: focusing on the development of ESH models for law enforcement agencies, they simultaneously engaged in promoting the idea of the need for civilian shockers at the highest level.
1997 — adoption of the new law "On Weapons"
The result of these efforts was the lifting of the ban on ASH in the new law "On weapons". Irina Anatolyevna Stolyarevskaya received a commendation from the State Duma for her work on the new law, and became an official expert on electroshock weapons of the State Duma Security Committee.
1998 — obtaining a license
The new law allowed citizens to use electroshock weapons only from Russian licensed manufacturers. The company "MART" became the first among such manufacturers.
2000 — the release of the first stun gun "Malvina-200-B" and the opening of its own certified testing laboratory
By the beginning of the new millennium, MART had developed a new battery-powered Malvina-200 model. And the creation of our own laboratory "Expertise of ESH" allowed us to raise the quality of products to a new level.
2001 — release of Taser cartridges for tasers
The "MARCH" shockers have learned how to shoot. So far, with Taser cartridges.
2002 — the first stun gun "AIR 107-U" (Spanish 350) with a removable battery
The first police taser…
2002 — the first state contract for stun guns of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
...and the first government contract!
2003 — the release of the first stun gun "Malvina-200-A" and the first inspection device "Periscope-165"
The catalog was supplemented with another model of the stun gun, and "Periscope-165" became the first swallow in a series of "non-shock" developments of "MARCH".
2004 — the release of the first stun gun "Karakurt"
The first "Karakurt" marked the beginning of a line of stun guns in the form of a pistol grip.
2006 — the release of the first firing stun gun, its own firing cartridge "BTER", and a shortened shocker "Scorpion-250"
"2006" is not just another mark in the chronology of the company, but a real milestone in its history. The first Russian shooting shocker and its cartridge were developed by specialists of "MART"! Soon, the company will completely switch to the production of contact-remote models of the ESU.
2010 — the release of the new inspection device "Periscope-185"
"Periscope-165" has grown, and has become "Periscope-185"!
2011 — the release of the light and sound cartridge "KSS" and shocker series "Scorpion" with removable batteries
Development of removable batteries: now the owners of Scorpions can not worry about a low battery. If there is no place to recharge the shocker, just put a new battery!
It is difficult to calculate how many times the KSS light and sound cartridge has been used since 2011. But we can say with confidence: those against whom "KSS" was used will never forget it!
2012 — the release of the first stun guns with a laser designator
Shooting with the BTER cartridge has become even more convenient!
2013 — release of a shortened shocker for the Ministry of Internal Affairs "AIR 107-U" (Spanish 250)
MART has always maintained feedback from users, listening to comments and suggestions. This is how the shortened AIR-107-U (sp.250) appeared.
2015 — the release of the Karakurt-Mini stun
gun The smallest and most unusual shocker in the company's catalog appeared in 2015. The original, unlike anything else, shape, cases of different colors, removable stickers made the "Minik" popular among fans of stylish devices.
2016 — release of the AIR stun gun "M-140"
A shocker in the shape of a pistol is for those who are sure that a weapon should look like a weapon. Special round-shaped firing cartridges have been developed for the M-140 air rifle.
2017 — the release of the Periscope-PRO video inspection device, a stun gun with a Cerberus metal detector, and the Skala electric shock shield
, the pre-jubilee year was rich in the development of special equipment for law enforcement agencies and customs services.
Today, MART GROUP is the official supplier of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and other structures and departments. The company regularly participates in exhibitions in Russia and abroad, MART GROUP products are sold in almost 20 countries. In Russia, civilian stun guns can be purchased in more than two hundred stores across the country, as well as ordered online.
Date:
18.05.2018
The main range of electroshock weapons in online stores is aimed at citizens, these models are designed for self-defense. However, tasers are also widely used by employees of various law enforcement agencies. And initially, shockers appeared precisely as non-lethal weapons for the police. Let's look at the employees of which organizations and departments in Russia can use electroshock weapons.
First of all, it's the police. Police officers of the patrol service, traffic police, district police officers, employees of operational regiments, schools and academies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs can wear and use stun guns.
In addition, the stun gun can be seen in the hands of soldiers of the SOBR, riot police, units of the internal troops and FSUE "Protection" of the Russian Guard. Tasers are allowed in military units of the FSB and the Federal Security Service of Russia, in military police units of the Ministry of Defense.
In December 2017, electroshock devices were included in the list of special equipment in service with the border authorities.
Very soon, by the beginning of the World Cup, permission to use stun guns will be granted to transport police officers.
Employees of the Investigative Committee, the Federal Penitentiary Service, the Federal Bailiff Service, as well as a number of federal state unitary enterprises have the right to arm themselves with tasers. This list includes "IN the Ministry of Energy", "IN the Ministry of Finance", "Russian Post", "Communications-Security", "Atom-protection", "STC protection Roscosmos", "Departmental protection of Railway transport of the Russian Federation".
Download the electronic version of the Catalog of electroshock self-defense weapons:
.pdf
Proper use of ASH and shields
Copyright@2014 - ООО «March GROUP».
*Privacy Policy and User Agreement
*Privacy Policy and User Agreement